App Store

Raiden Jets Fighter as an Aviator craft session

Third on the aileron, still on the shortlist. Raiden Jets Fighter: Arcade Craft Shooting Game is the oldest Aviator craft card we keep, and this Q&A refuses to sand down the listing’s rough edges.

Raiden Jets Fighter icon

Raiden Jets Fighter: Arcade Craft Shooting Game
Shenzhen Shi Youyou Technology Co.,Ltd · bundle com.friendivity.SpaceCraftEn · id 1090273338

  • 2.3 out of 5 from 7 ratings
  • Age rating: 9+
  • Size 54.5 MB · iOS 6.0+ · version 1.3 (updated 12 Apr 2016)
  • EN · Action · Free with In-App Purchases
  • Developer has not provided App Privacy details

No public install counter on the App Store card. We did not invent one.

Checked 22 October 2026

App Store
Raiden Jets Fighter preview

Why keep a 2.3-star Aviator craft card at all?

Because Mode B on this desk ranks what we shortlisted; it does not delete inconvenient averages. The published score is 2.3 from 7 ratings — the same thin sample size as STRIKERS, with a very different mean. Hiding the card would make the aileron look cleaner and less honest. We would rather show the third place and explain it.

Shenzhen Shi Youyou Technology Co.,Ltd is the developer on the listing. Bundle com.friendivity.SpaceCraftEn, id 1090273338. Action genre. Free with In-App Purchases. English. Those are the anchors we trust.

How does an Aviator craft session play here?

Expect a compact arcade shooter fantasy: craft on screen, enemies in lanes, short bursts of attention. We do not inflate the design with systems the store page never documents. Relative to STRIKERS, the binary is small (54.5 MB) and the OS floor is ancient (iOS 6.0+). Relative to Airport Madness, the fantasy returns to piloting instead of tower sequencing.

An Aviator craft session on this card is often a curiosity run — reopen, feel the older presentation, decide whether nostalgia outweighs the dated update. That is a legitimate use of a shortlist slot when the desk’s job is comparison, not cheerleading.

What does the 2016 update date imply?

Version 1.3 updated 12 Apr 2016 is the clearest age signal on the aileron. We do not invent “abandoned” as a legal status; we report the date. Readers who require recent security or privacy work should weigh the missing App Privacy details alongside that stamp. The listing itself states the developer has not provided App Privacy details — we repeat that sentence because it is store text, not our spin.

iOS 6.0+ tells you the historical target more than it tells you about today’s App Store review pipeline. If your device is current, the question is taste and trust, not whether the OS string blocks install.

Who might still enjoy this Aviator listing?

Players who specifically want a lightweight craft shooter and accept a thin, low average. People comparing how arcade Aviator cards aged between 2016 and 2024. Desk readers who want the full shortlist before they spend time on STRIKERS alone.

Who should skip it: anyone who needs a populated privacy nutrition label, anyone who treats star averages as a hard floor above 3.0, or anyone looking for a maintained live-ops shooter. Parents should note 9+ and the IAP label, then decide with Apple’s tools.

What is Raiden Jets Fighter not?

It is not the lead Aviator card on Vinmedmere. It is not a title with a public install counter — no public install counter on the App Store card; we did not invent one. It is not a guaranteed match for every “Raiden” brand expectation you might bring from cabinets or other publishers; we only speak to this listing’s name and facts. It is not hosted here. Installs happen on the App Store.

We are not affiliated with the developer or Apple. Store and app names belong to their owners.

How did the rating sample shape our writing?

Seven ratings at 2.3 mean every voice is loud. We refuse to average in imaginary reviews. The methodology page explains why star average still sorts the stack even when samples are tiny: it is the figure the store publishes, and inventing a different sort key would be theatre.

If the sample grows or the average moves, the aileron will re-check. Until then, NO. 3 is the correct label for 22 October 2026.

How should you approach install night?

Read the privacy gap first. Confirm the IAP label fits your device rules. Then open the store link if you still want the craft fantasy. Pairing it after Airport Madness can soften the jump from tower calm to arcade noise; pairing it after STRIKERS will make the presentation age more obvious. The evening guide covers that pacing.

How should privacy-conscious Aviator players read the missing label?

Apple’s App Privacy section is blank because the developer has not provided details. That is a store fact, not an accusation we embroider. On the aileron we treat a missing label as a stop sign for households that require nutrition-label completeness, and as a warning flag for everyone else. We will not invent data types the developer never declared.

Pair that gap with the April 2016 update and you get the clearest “enter with eyes open” card on the shortlist. Curiosity sessions remain valid; long-term trust is a personal call we refuse to make for you.

Does the SpaceCraftEn bundle name change the Aviator framing?

Bundle com.friendivity.SpaceCraftEn looks like historical packaging. We still title the review around the public App Store name — Raiden Jets Fighter: Arcade Craft Shooting Game — because that is what readers search and what the ranking card shows. The bundle string is metadata for corrections, not a cue to rewrite the fantasy as generic space combat without the Aviator craft angle we already scoped.

Action genre plus craft wording in the title is enough for the shortlist theme. We do not stretch the metaphor into airport towers; that job belongs to Fluik’s card. Size 54.5 MB keeps the install cheap if you still want the coda after reading every caveat twice.

How do we compare this Aviator craft card to STRIKERS without cruelty?

Side by side, STRIKERS wins on stars, update freshness, language pair, and privacy labelling presence. Raiden wins on install weight and on nostalgia for older mobile arcade frames. Cruelty would be deleting the third card; honesty is ranking it third with every caveat visible. The aileron needs that contrast so readers see what “maintained” looks like next to “historical.”

We still link the App Store button. Independent desks show the door even when they do not recommend walking through it every night. If you install, you do it on Apple’s side after reading the missing privacy note twice.

English-only on the card is fine for this desk’s locale. iOS 6.0+ is a museum label more than a recommendation. Version 1.3 stays quoted exactly so corrections have a baseline.

What would make us remove this Aviator craft card?

Not a low score alone — the score is already visible. Removal would follow a methodology change, a vanished store listing, or a decision that the shortlist should only carry titles updated within a defined window. We have not adopted that window yet. Until we do, NO. 3 remains the honest third voice on the aileron, caveats included, install still outbound to Apple.

Where next from this Aviator craft review?

App Store · Ranking · Methodology · Dispatches